🔗 Share this article

The beloved novelist Jilly Cooper, who died suddenly at the 88 years old, achieved sales of 11m books of her various sweeping books over her five-decade writing career. Beloved by all discerning readers over a particular age (mid-forties), she was introduced to a younger audience last year with the TV adaptation of Rivals.

The Rutshire Chronicles

Cooper purists would have liked to view the Rutshire chronicles in order: commencing with Riders, originally published in the mid-80s, in which the character Rupert Campbell-Black, scoundrel, philanderer, rider, is initially presented. But that’s a sidebar – what was remarkable about seeing Rivals as a complete series was how brilliantly Cooper’s world had remained relevant. The chronicles encapsulated the eighties: the power dressing and puffball skirts; the preoccupation with social class; aristocrats sneering at the Technicolored nouveau riche, both dismissing everyone else while they snipped about how warm their bubbly was; the gender dynamics, with harassment and assault so commonplace they were practically figures in their own right, a pair you could count on to move the plot along.

While Cooper might have lived in this era fully, she was never the proverbial fish not noticing the ocean because it’s ubiquitous. She had a compassion and an keen insight that you might not expect from listening to her speak. Everyone, from the pet to the pony to her parents to her French exchange’s brother, was always “absolutely sweet” – unless, that is, they were “absolutely divine”. People got groped and worse in Cooper’s work, but that was never OK – it’s remarkable how OK it is in many far more literary books of the era.

Class and Character

She was affluent middle-class, which for real-world terms meant that her parent had to work for a living, but she’d have characterized the classes more by their customs. The middle classes anxiously contemplated about everything, all the time – what others might think, primarily – and the upper classes didn’t give a … well “stuff”. She was risqué, at times incredibly so, but her language was never coarse.

She’d describe her childhood in idyllic language: “Dad went to Dunkirk and Mom was deeply concerned”. They were both completely gorgeous, involved in a lifelong love match, and this Cooper mirrored in her own partnership, to a businessman of military histories, Leo Cooper. She was 24, he was 27, the marriage wasn’t without hiccups (he was a philanderer), but she was always at ease giving people the formula for a successful union, which is noisy mattress but (big reveal), they’re squeaking with all the mirth. He didn't read her books – he picked up Prudence once, when he had flu, and said it made him feel unwell. She didn’t mind, and said it was mutual: she wouldn’t be seen dead reading war chronicles.

Forever keep a journal – it’s very hard, when you’re 25, to recollect what being 24 felt like

Initial Novels

Prudence (1978) was the fifth installment in the Romance series, which commenced with Emily in 1975. If you approached Cooper in reverse, having commenced in her later universe, the initial books, alternatively called “the books named after upper-class women” – also Bella and Harriet – were close but no cigar, every protagonist feeling like a test-run for the iconic character, every heroine a little bit insipid. Plus, page for page (Without exact data), there was less sex in them. They were a bit reserved on issues of decorum, women always being anxious that men would think they’re promiscuous, men saying outrageous statements about why they preferred virgins (comparably, apparently, as a real man always wants to be the initial to open a tin of Nescafé). I don’t know if I’d suggest reading these books at a young age. I assumed for a while that that is what posh people genuinely felt.

They were, however, incredibly precisely constructed, effective romances, which is far more difficult than it seems. You experienced Harriet’s unplanned pregnancy, Bella’s pissy family-by-marriage, Emily’s Scottish isolation – Cooper could take you from an hopeless moment to a jackpot of the soul, and you could not ever, even in the early days, put your finger on how she achieved it. One minute you’d be laughing at her highly specific accounts of the bedding, the subsequently you’d have emotional response and no idea how they got there.

Literary Guidance

Inquired how to be a writer, Cooper would often state the type of guidance that the famous author would have said, if he could have been arsed to guide a beginner: employ all five of your perceptions, say how things scented and looked and sounded and touched and flavored – it greatly improves the writing. But likely more helpful was: “Always keep a diary – it’s very hard, when you’re mid-twenties, to recall what being 24 felt like.” That’s one of the primary realizations you detect, in the more detailed, character-rich books, which have 17 heroines rather than just one, all with very upper-class names, unless they’re American, in which case they’re called Helen. Even an years apart of several years, between two sisters, between a man and a lady, you can hear in the speech.

A Literary Mystery

The historical account of Riders was so perfectly typical of the author it can’t possibly have been accurate, except it definitely is factual because a major newspaper ran an appeal about it at the period: she completed the entire draft in the early 70s, well before the early novels, took it into the city center and left it on a vehicle. Some texture has been intentionally omitted of this anecdote – what, for case, was so important in the urban area that you would abandon the only copy of your novel on a public transport, which is not that far from abandoning your baby on a railway? Surely an rendezvous, but which type?

Cooper was wont to amp up her own disorder and haplessness